Misandry Bubble

Linked to it here. Now excerpted down to 5 pages.

Misandry Bubble Quotes

The Cultural Thesis
All of us have been taught how women have supposedly been oppressed throughout human existence …Most of this narrative stems from ‘feminists’ comparing the plight of average women to the topmost men …As far as selective anecdotes like voting rights go, in the vast majority of cases, men could not vote either.

Genetic research has shown that before the modern era, 80% of women managed to reproduce, but only 40% of men did …Research across gorillas, chimpanzees, and primitive human tribes shows that men are promiscuous and polygamous….{and] women are … hypergamous … As a result, women are the first to want into a monogamous relationship, and the first to want out.

Societies that enforced monogamous marriage made sure all beta men had wives…  Women, in turn, received a provider, a protector… All societies that achieved great advances and lasted for multiple centuries followed this formula with very little deviation, …  Societies that deviated from this were quickly replaced.

Four unrelated forces simultaneously combined to entirely distort the balance of civilization
1) Easy contraception
2) ‘No fault’ divorce, asset division, and alimony :
3) Female economic freedom :
4) Female-Centric social engineering

Divorce lawyers, like any other professional group, will seek conditions that are good for business.  What makes attorneys different from, say, engineers or salespeople, is that a) they know precisely how to lobby for changes to the legal system, bypassing voters and the US constitution,… and b) what benefits them is directly harmful to the fabric of society ,… children in particular.

So, to review, the differences between Marriage 1.0 and Marriage 2.0 are :
a) No fault asset division and alimony, where the abandoned spouse has to pay if he earns more, even if he did not want a divorce, and even if he is a victim of abuse, cuckolding, or adultery.  There are rare instances of high-earning women getting caught in this trap as well.
b) Women marrying after having 5 or more sexual partners, compared to just 0-1 previously.  This makes it harder for the woman to form a pair bond with her husband.
c) Women marrying at an age when very few years of their peak beauty are remaining, compared to a decade or more remaining under Marriage 1.0.
d) Child custody is almost never granted to the man, so he loses his children on a ‘no fault’ basis.

In the past, the steady hand of a young woman’s mother and grandmother knew that her beauty was temporary, and that the most seductive man was not the best husband …A complex sexual past works against women even if the same works in favor of men, due to the natural sexual attraction triggers of each gender.  A wise man once said, “A key that can open many locks is a valuable key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a useless lock.”

‘Game’ … a definition :
The traits that make a man attractive to women are learnable skills, that improve with practice.  Once a man learns these skills, he is indistinguishable from a man who had natural talents in this area.  Whether a man then chooses to use these skills to secure one solid relationship or multiple brief ones, is entirely up to him.

…what women say a man should do is often quite the antithesis of what would actually bring him success.  For example, being a needy, supplicative, eager-to-please man is precisely the opposite behavior that a man should employ …Many statements from her are ‘tests’ to see if the man can remain congruent in his ‘alpha’ personality

‘feminists’ reveal their ideology to be one that seeks to secure equality for women in the few areas where they lag, while distracting observers from the vast array of areas where women are in a more favorable position relative to men (the judicial system, hiring and admissions quotas, media portrayals, social settings, etc.)

As it is profitable to claim victimhood in this age, a good indicator is whether any condemnation by the supposedly oppressed of their oppressor could be similarly uttered if the positions were reversed.

The male non-compliance labeled as ‘misogyny’ thus becomes a reaction to many years of unopposed misandry heaped on him first, when he initially harbored no such sentiments.  Kick a friendly dog enough times, and you get a nasty dog.

Violence Against Women Act (… blatantly declares that violence against women is far worse than violence against men. …Tiger Woods’ wife beat him with a blunt weapon and scratched his face, only to be applauded by ‘feminists’ in a ‘you go girl’ manner.

So, to review, if a woman has second thoughts about a tryst a few days later, she can, without penalty, ruin a man financially and send him to prison for 15 years.  ‘Feminists’ consider this acceptable.  At the same time, even though men consider being cuckolded a worse fate than being raped, ‘feminists’ want to make this easier for a woman to do, by preventing paternity testing.  They already have rigged laws so that the man, upon ‘no fault’ divorce, has to pay alimony, to a woman who cuckolded him.

Shaming Language and Projection as a Substitute for Rational Debate : [M]ost men instinctively treat women with chivalry and enshrine them on exalted pedestals.  Every day, we see men willing to defend women or do favors for them.  … On the other hand, we routinely see anti-male statements uttered by ‘feminists’…  When well-known ‘feminists’ openly state that 90% of the male population should be exterminated, the unsupported accusation of ‘misogyny’ is a very pure manifestion of their own misandric projection.

On the second charge of being a ‘loser who cannot get laid’, … men who have had little experience with women are the ones placing women on pedestals, …  Having sex with a large number of women does not increase respect for women…

‘Feminism’ as Genuine Misogyny :… Monogamous marriage not only masked the gap between ‘alpha’ and ‘beta’ men, but also masked the gap between attractiveness of women before and after their Wile E. Coyote moment.  By seducing women with the myth that a promiscuous single life after the age of 35 is a worthy goal, many women in their late 30s are left to find that they command far less male attention than women just a decade younger than them.  ‘Feminism’ sold them a moral code entirely unsuited to their physical and mental realities, causing great sadness to these women.

But most importantly, ‘feminists’ devalued the traditional areas of female expertise (raising the next generation of citizens), while attaching value only to areas of male expertise (the boardroom, the military, sexual promiscuity) … Telling women that emulating their mothers and grandmothers is less valuable than mimicking men sounds quite misogynistic to me, … women are more unhappy than ever

Social Conservatives, White Knights, and Girlie-Men : Chivalry greatly increased a man’s prospects of marriage, but the reasons for this have been forgotten.  Prior to the modern era, … The approval of the girl’s father was a non-negotiable channel in the process.  If a young man could show the girl’s parents that he would place her on a pedestal, they could be convinced to sanction the union.  The girl herself was not the primary audience of the chivalry, as the sexual attraction of the girl herself was rarely aroused by chivalry,

…after lunatic ‘feminists’, these pedestalizing White Knights are the next most responsible party for the misandry in Western society today.

Lastly, the religious ‘social conservatives’ … doing absolutely nothing about the divorce-incentivizing turn that the laws have taken, … .  What they claim to be of utmost importance to them has been destroyed right under their noses, and they still are too dimwitted to comprehend why.  No other interest group in America has been such a total failure at their own stated mission.  To be duped into believing that a side-issue like ‘gay marriage’ is a mortal threat to traditional marriage, yet miss the legal changes that correlate to a rise in divorce rates by creating incentives for divorce … Aren’t conservatives the people who are supposed to grasp that incentives drive behavior?

The Economic Thesis

Ceilings and Floors of Glass : [A] ‘glass ceiling’ of pervasive sexism … explains why 50% of the CEOs of major corporations are not women.  What is never mentioned is the equally valid ‘glass floor’, where we see that 90% of imprisonments, suicides, and crippling occupational injuries are of men.  If these outcomes are the results of the actions or choices of men who suffer from them, then is that not the same reason that determines who rises above the ‘glass ceiling’?

One of the most dishonest myths of all is the claim that ‘women earn just 75% of men for the same job’ … women entrepreneurs could hire other women and out-compete any male-dominated business if such a pay gap existed, but we do not see this happening in any country in the world.

In the recent recession and ongoing jobless recovery, the male unemployment rate continues to be much higher than the female unemployment rate. …’feminist’ groups have lobbied hard to ensure that government stimulus funds were steered to boost female employment at the expense of assistance for men.

The vast majority of social security taxes are paid by men, but are collected by women …women consume two-thirds of all US healthcare, despite most of this $2.5 Trillion annual expenditure being paid by men …virtually all government spending except for defense and infrastructure, from Medicare to Obamacare to welfare to public sector jobs for women to the expansion of the prison population, is either a net transfer of wealth from men to women, or a byproduct of the destruction of Marriage 1.0.

non-defense expenditures have steadily risen since 1960. … most of this increase is a direct or indirect result of ‘feminism’.  … it would appear that 20% of GDP is being spent just to make the government a substitute for the institution of Marriage …The left has finally found a perfect Trojan Horse through which to expand a tyrannical state.

When men are severed from their children with no right to obstruct divorce, when they are excluded from the labor market not by market forces but rather by social engineering, and when they learn that the society they once believed in and in some cases joined the military to protect, has no respect for their aspirations, these men have no reason to sustain such a society.

The Contract Between the Sexes : A single man does not require much in order to survive. …Men who excelled under the societal rules of just two decades ago are often left totally betrayed by the rules of today, and results in them refusing to sustain a society heavily dependent on their productivity and ingenuity. …To see what happens when the role of the husband and father is devalued, and the state steps in as a replacement, look no further than the African American community.

Additionally, people seem to have forgotten that the physical safety of society, particularly of women, is entirely dependent on ratio of ‘aggressor’ men to ‘protector’ men staying below a certain critical threshold. …Safety is like air – it is only noticed when it is gone.  Women have a tremendous amount to lose by creating a lot of indifferent men.

Population Displacement : …As the table shows, a 1:1:1 ratio of three young ladies takes only 40 years to yield a 12:4:0 ratio of grandchildren.  Consider, also, that we are already 20 years into this 40-year process, …Lefto-‘feminists’ will be outbred and replaced very quickly, and rural American conservatives will be the only resiliently youthful population among all the world’s white ethnicities.  The state that lefto-‘feminists’ so admire will quickly turn on them once the state calculates that these women are neither producing new taxpayers nor new technologies,

The Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation
…this article is not the ‘Misandry Crisis’ … It is ‘The Misandry Bubble’, because the forces that will ensure the demise of the present mistreatment of men are already on the horizon.

1) Game : …if the number of solid practitioners even begins to approach 20%, multiple parasitic beasts, from female moochers to the tax-swilling state to the corrupt real-estate and divorce lawyer industries, can be effectively starved.

2) Adult Entertainment Technologies of 2020 : …Another positive ramification of advanced adult entertainment technologies is that women will have to sharpen the sole remaining attribute which technology cannot substitute – the capacity to make a man feel loved.  Modern women will be forced to reacquaint themselves with this ancient concept in order to generate a competitive advantage.  This necessity could lead to a movement of pragmatic women conducting a wholesale repudiation of misandry masquerading as ‘feminism’ that has created this state of affairs

3) Globalization :
a) Islam : British men, in desperation, are turning to Sharia courts in order to avoid the ruin that British law would inflict on them.
b) Expatriation : …almost every American man who relocates to Asia or Latin America gives a glowing testimonial about the quality of his new life.  …calling such men ‘misogynists’ are curiously troubled that these same men are leaving the US.  Shouldn’t ‘feminists’ be happy if ‘misogynists’ are leaving?
c) Medical Tourism : …While most customers of Indian fertility clinics are couples, there have been quite a few single men opting to create their own biological babies this way.
…[F]orces of globalization are far bigger than those propping up the current lop-sided status quo.

4) Male Economic Disengagement and Resultant Tax-Base Erosion : …there will never, ever be a successful human society where men have no incentive to aspire to the full maximum of their productive and entrepreneurial capabilities.  …Less tax revenue not just means fewer subsidies for single mothers and government jobs for women, but less money for law enforcement.  Less tax revenue also means fewer police officers, and fewer court resources through which to imprison men.

These Four Horsemen will all converge at the end of this decade to transfer the costs of misandry from men onto women, and on 1/1/2020, we will assess how the misandry bubble popped and the fallout that women are suffering under for having made the mistake of letting ‘feminists’ control their destiny.

Who Should Care?

  • Anyone with a son, brother, nephew, or mentee entering marriage, particularly without the partial protection of a pre-nuptial agreement. As described earlier, he can be ruined, separated from his children, and jailed in a manner few would suspect could happen in any advanced democracy. The suicide rate of divorced men is shockingly high.
  • Anyone who agrees that a civilization where most adults are part of two-parent families will always outcompete and displace a civilization where a large portion of adults are not leading two-parent families.
  • Anyone with minor grandchildren, nieces and nephews, or great-grandchildren. The divorce laws incentivize using children as pawns during divorce, and no serious thinker can dispute the trouble that haunts the children of divorce for years thereafter. ‘Feminists’ concoct bogus research about the role of the father being superfluous, but observation of real-world examples proves otherwise.
  • Anyone who owns an expensive home in a community of families. The growing aversion of men for marriage will create fewer new families, and thus fewer buyers for those homes. I remind everyone that if they have 20% equity in their home and an 80% mortgage, even a 20% decline in home prices is a 100% decline in your equity, which might be all of your net worth. Detroit, the first major US city to see a loss of beta male employment prospects, saw the average home price drop from $98,000 as recently as 2003 to just $14,000 today. A decline smaller than this would devastate the net worth of remaining home owners, and can happen in any community of single-family homes.  If you own a home, your net worth is inseparably tied to the formation and preservation of two-parent families.
  • Anyone concerned about rising crime. 70% of African American children are born to single mothers, and the number among white children is approaching 30%. Furthermore, the ‘mancession’ will eventually ensure that the only means of survival for many men is to form gangs and take valuables by force.  Unloved men, who in the past would have been paired with wives, are easy for both gangs and terrorist organizations to recruit.
  • Anyone concerned about the widening federal and state budget shortfalls and medicare/healthcare costs, for which the state continues to insist on raising taxes rather than cut spending. Fewer men choosing to work the long hours needed to earn high incomes will break the model of the top 10% paying 75% of taxes, and more men being jailed for alimony arrears, not being good enough in bed, or defending himself from spousal violence will drain tax coffers. It costs $60,000 a year to maintain a prisoner.
  • Anyone who thinks the US Constitution is a valuable document.  ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ does not apply in many areas of feminist-heavy law.  The previously discussed shadow state is using ‘feminism’ to conduct all sorts of horrible tyranny against innocent men, which greatly compromises America’s ability to claim that it is still the land of the free.
  • Anyone concerned about national security. As more men feel that this society is betraying him, fewer will risk their lives in the military only to find that divorce lawyers have been persuading his wife to leave the marriage while he is deployed.  Coming home from one battlefield only to be inserted in another is a shameful betrayal of our finest young men. Furthermore, I have already mentioned how British men are turning to Islamic courts in the hopes avoiding ruin at the hands of British misandrist laws. Quite a few men may conclude that Islam offers them more than their native society that has turned against their gender, and will act towards self-preservation.
  • Any woman who is appalled by the treatment of any woman who deviates from ‘feminist’ doctrine, and who is troubled by the words and actions of self-proclaimed ‘feminists’ today.  If you believe that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, you should worry about what ‘feminists’ are courting by kicking a friendly dog too many times.
  • Lastly, anyone with a young daughter or sister, who is about to enter a world where it is much harder for all but the most beautiful women to marry, where the costs of crazed ‘feminism’ are soon going to be transferred away from men and onto women, even if she had no interest in this doctrine of hate. As stated in the Executive Summary at the start, ‘feminists’ are leading average women into the abyss.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s