Of Course It’s Unnatural

uncivilizedJonah Goldberg argues that the healthy, modern civilization is unnatural, not far from Hobbes’s assertion that the natural life is nasty, brutish and short. Civilization is unnatural and corruption, like rust, is what naturally happens to every good institution. Something happened about 300 years ago that gave us an unnatural world of full bellies, sanitation, medicine, and human rights which he calls “the Miracle”.

When people say that the government or the nation is — or should be — like a family (or a military unit or any other microcosmic group), they argue for erasing everything that enables the Miracle. But that is what people crave today.

This is all to introduce his new book, “The Suicide of the West“. He says large factions on all sides are like the farmer who killed the golden goose.

When the goose politely demurs, he kills it out of a sense of entitlement — the opposite of gratitude.

The Miracle is our goose. And rather than be grateful for it, our schools, our culture, and many of our politicians say we should resent it for not doing more. Conservatism is a form of gratitude, because we conserve only what we are grateful for. Our society is talking itself out of gratitude for the Miracle and teaching our children resentment. Our culture affirms our feelings as the most authentic sources of truth when they are merely the expressions of instincts, and considers the Miracle a code word for white privilege, greed, and oppression.

This is corruption. And it is a choice. Collectively, we are embracing entitlement over gratitude. That is suicidal. I did not call my book “Decline of the West” or “Death of the West,” because suicide is a choice.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Of Course It’s Unnatural

  1. Mike Enns says:

    Human interactions are complicated. Really, really complicated. And that is why we have moral systems which draw from centuries and perhaps millennia of experience. The western world drew from a christian moral system that emphasized the individual. That turned out to be catalyst for the modern world.
    It is hubris to believe that one can build a moral system from the ground up. Especially those that devolve to extremes using elementary logic. For example, since some animals appear to show sentience, and humans are sentient then human rights should to extend to animals. How exactly does that help humans interact with each other?
    Is it moral to be accommodating in all situations – no. That leads to some bad outcomes for one and perhaps for those around him.
    This is of course an intensely conservative view. Morality exists and must to be discovered. It is not constructed. Human interactions can’t be molded into some abstract ideal – that is the problem Nietzsche identified with the death of god. As he predicted millions died from several such attempts. Yet the lesson has not been learned.
    Are morals natural – yes. Are they obvious – no.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s