Manosphere Readings

L051247The New Dating Game; Charlotte Allen in The Weekly Standard gives a thoughtful overview of the manosphere perspective on the feminist wreckage on relationships.

The Futurist at singularity2050.com has a longish essay on feminism’s effect on society (archived) and demographics. If the future goes according to the feminist architects’ plans the end state will not. They will be on the business end of the adage, “No finite being can accurately predict its next state”. Unfortunately, my schadenfreude is impaired by that fact that this process will cost me my own civilization. It is, at times, brilliant.

… ‘feminists’ devalued the traditional areas of female expertise (raising the next generation of citizens), while attaching value only to areas of male expertise (the boardroom, the military, sexual promiscuity) … women are more unhappy than ever  …

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Gruber Reveal

Obamacare has a new credibility scandal. The substance is not so new. People have been saying for years that the bill is needlessly complex and that it has dozens of little disasters hidden within. That if people understood it, They’d never support it. Some went so far as to say that a bill that convoluted could only be deliberate. It’s just that the critic might be dismissed as partisan…until now.

Now the most cynical of interpretations is undeniable fact, straight from the horse’s mouth. Jonathan Gruber is on video admitting, no, bragging that the law was written to mislead the public and the CBO as to its true effects.

Gruber is wrong, however, on two points. Much (most?) of the public was not fooled, as the bill has never enjoyed widespread support. Gruber’s justification for lying, that the public’s wishes are “stupid” and incoherent, is not true. Meeting the public’s broad health care goals is possible, It just isn’t compatible with the government’s political goals.

Contradictions only arise when we combine Barro’s public wish list with certain existing policy phenomena, including:

  • Requiring everyone to carry comprehensive health insurance covering various routine services, irrespective of whether this makes sense for them;
  • Substantial and opaque income redistribution through the healthcare system;
  • Financing seniors’ health services through federal taxes;
  • Maintaining the tax preference for compensation in the form of health benefits over wages;
  • Securing the political support of health insurance companies.

The other scandal, though, is the complicity of so many experts, including but not limited to the media.

That politicians should try to exploit the accounting rules was inevitable; that is what people do with accounting rules. I’m not saying that’s what the rules are for, or that they do no good; I’m just saying that about eight seconds after your rules are made, some bright Johnny will start figuring out a way to game them.

What is not inevitable is that journalists should effectively sanction this by saying it’s no big deal. We don’t have to get elected, after all. And those politicians and policy makers aren’t our bosses; the reading public is. We shouldn’t act like we’re part of the insider clique that decides what other people need to know — no, worse, that decides what other people do know. If we knew this all along and voters didn’t, that doesn’t mean voters don’t have a right to be outraged. It means that we’ve lost track of whose side we’re on.

It Continues.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Feminism Seen Most Clearly From 300 Million Miles

1 small shirt for a man, 1 giant leap backward for women

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The New Parent Trap

Why are first-world demographics crumbling? Most people blame economics, urban living and feminism. Maybe, but it is hard to deny that Reynolds has a point here:

eight in a minivan 1-001Parenting was always hard work, of course. But aside from the economic payoffs, parents used to get a lot of social benefits, too. But in recent decades, a collection of parenting “experts” and safety-fascist types have extinguished some of the benefits while raising the costs, to the point where what’s amazing isn’t that people are having fewer kids, but that people are having kids at all.

…when she was a newlywed…you weren’t seen as fully a member of the adult world until you had kids. Nowadays to have kids means something closer to an expulsion from the adult world. People in the suburbs buy SUVs instead of minivans…because the SUVs lack the minivan’s close association with low-prestige activities like parenting…Why should kayaking be more prestigious than parenting? Because parenting isn’t prestigious in our society. If it were, childless people would drive minivans just to partake of the aura.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Horses for Courses

christine-odonnell-2011-2 Alternate title: What Was Wrong With Christine O’Donnell. wendy-davis-nytimes-mag
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is the Middle Class Shrinking?

…because Joel Kotkin says it’s being squeezed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Conservatives’ Great Disadvantage

in the public debate:

Their position is true but boring, that of their opponents exciting but false.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment