Heinlein’s history lesson in Starship Troopers is interesting, if not perfect. More interesting are the excerpts from Bork and Lasch on liberal vs conservative; individuals vs institutions.
Libertarians, it is said, focus on the individual; socialists and progressives focus on the group. Yet I find that unsatisfying, especially if we equate the right with libertarians and the left with socialism. Does the right not care for churches or patriotism? Does the left not esteem rebellious freethinkers and protesters?
In terms of individual rights and sovereignty, classical liberalism is an ideology of the right. Yet in human nature, classical liberals had a touch of Rousseau: that the individual was born perfect. For the conservative, the only perfection in man’s nature is a yearning. Classical liberals hold the individual to be the basis of society. Yet they say one society is better than another because of its institutions.
A North American conservative or modern classical liberal position must distinguish with the question: the individual versus what? In terms of dignity, the individual is to be valued. In terms of reliability, the institution is more to be trusted than the individual. In terms of menace, the individual is less of a threat than the institution. This is especially important when the institution, like government is entrusted with powers of coercion. As George Washington warned, “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence ~ it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearsome master.”
It is hard to reconcile the tension between the superiority of the individual vs the institution. Left-liberals choose the individual. Progressives choose the institution. Politically, I don’t see a coherent integration except pragmatism. The right has the same problem, except for some libertarians who simply dispense with institutions.
Reconciliation is easier for Christians or Jews. They can say that God is perfect; man is sinful. Man’s best hope is to be more like God; to work to that end; and to humbly recognize that man’s efforts are imperfect. They use institutions to teach men. They expect men to constrain institutions. They believe both to be imperfect instruments of God.